image_pdfimage_print

“Am I Crazy” on Youtube

Jonathan Whitcomb sitting on his living-room couch

By the cryptozoologist Jonathan D. Whitcomb

For five months, I’ve been regularly uploading videos to my new Youtube channel Protect Animal Life. Yesterday I uploaded “Am I Crazy? Living Pterosaurs.” That deserves an explanation.

Three years ago an anonymous Youtuber uploaded a long video that attacked what that man portrayed as my beliefs and my positions on extant pterosaurs. He had no problem using my real name in that video.

By August of 2019, that sarcastic and inaccurate and misleading video had accumulated over half a million views on Youtube. I felt that it was time to make a short video for my own Youtube channel (Protect Animal Life), a video in which I suggest that I am not crazy and the concept of living pterosaurs is not a crazy idea. Here’s the video, which has a bit of humor:

Mini-documentary video uploaded to Youtube on Sep 2, 2019

.

###

.

Living Pterosaurs – in newspapers

On occasion over the past 16 years, a critic might say something like, “If pterosaur are still living, why do we not see newspaper articles on them?” Such a skeptic may assume that he or she would have heard or read about such a newspaper article if it existed. In reality, no critic of living-pterosaur investigations reads every headline of every newspaper, not even just the ones printed in the United States.

.

Do crazy people see pterodactyls?

. . . those eyewitnesses, more numerous than most Americans would guess, need no longer be afraid that everyone will think them crazy, and no longer need they feel alone.

.

Living pterosaur video on Youtube

This mini-documentary gives you several eyewitness reports of apparent non-extinct “pterodactyls” observed in Hawaii.

.

A playlist on Youtube: “From me to you”

As of September 3, 2019, these are the videos on this playlist:

  • Am I Crazy? living pterosaurs
  • A Confession About a Pterodactyl
  • Living Pterosaurs – in newspapers

.

New Youtube video on pterosaurs

Jonathan Whitcomb is on camera in “A Confession About a Pterodactyl”

.

Youtube video on “pterodactyls” in California

The video is titled “A confession about a pterodactyl” and gives my account of an ironic twist in my life: from a severe skeptic to a firm believer in modern pterosaurs.

.

Flying dinosaur in Africa

Another video on living pterosaurs

.

Video about pterosaurs in newspaper articles

I uploaded a video to Youtube: “Living Pterosaurs – in newspapers,” an introduction to some newspaper articles published over the years, one of them being back in the late 1800’s. Part of this mini-documentary explains part of why such news coverage is rare in the United States: Average readers assume that all “pterodactyls” became extinct long ago, and any reported sighting of a living one should be a mistake.

.

Ropen Hair

flying ropen, or long-tailed pterosaur - sketch by Eskin Kuhn

By the investigative journalist and ropen expert Jonathan Whitcomb

Over the years, I’ve rarely mentioned much on this blog about the possibility that ropens in general are covered with some amount of fine hair. Only a small fraction of the total eyewitnesses have been close enough to see such a detail, even if they had a mind to take notice of hair, or lack thereof, at the time of their sightings. Let’s now look into this.

Why talk about hair on modern pterosaurs, or apparent living pterosaurs, now? I recently saw part of a video on Youtube, a highly critical attack against the possibility that such flying creatures exist. My video is a response to the idea that the ropen is not a real animal because it is reported to have no hair. Watch the video to get an introduction to my response:

A new mini-documentary about the ropen

In reality, most eyewitnesses of the ropen are too far away to see whether or not the apparent pterosaur (or ‘pterodactyl’) had any hair or similar skin covering, except that those persons say that it does not have feathers.

The critics fail to realize a number of things, being ignorant of key principles and details that make all the difference.

This video shows how difficult it is to see human hair on human arms at beach scenes, even though we know that people naturally have hair on their arms. Being unable to see hair or lack of hair on human arms at a distance is in no way evidence that humans, as a species, do not have arm hair.

Now apply that to ropens who are seen by people. Even if the eyewitnesses were looking for an appearance of hair or lack thereof, they were usually too far away to see that.

###

.

Featherless flying animal in Texas

He estimated the wingspan at 4 1/2 to 5 feet with a long tail that had a “diamond type shape” at the end [Update: See other posts on the ropen]. The creature had leathery skin rather than any hair or feathers [according to the eyewitness; keep in mind that some leather products still have some hair, and it is possible that a small amount of fine hair may have been present on the flying creature that was seen in Marion County, Texas, in 1995].

.

Terms and Conditions for using this site

You must not use this Website if you disagree with any of these Website Standard Terms and Conditions.

.

The ropen and a diamond-shaped end of tail

The great majority of persons who have contacted me give details that have some correlation with many previous reports that I have received over the years. In fact, certain details are very common, especially a lack of feathers on the flying creature and a long tail that ends in a structure that is diamond-shaped or like a spade (or triangular).

.

The ropen of Papua New Guinea

This video is a short introduction to this apparent modern Rhamphorhynchoid pterosaur that lives in Papua New Guinea.

.

Critic of living pterosaurs

How large is [this critic’s] “Living Pterosaurs” online page? It has tens of thousands of words. In fact, it mentions me by name 463 times, yes four hundred sixty three times (“26 Nov. 2017” version). Many web pages, on whatever subject, do not even have a total word count over 400. It brings to my mind a phrase in Hamlet: “the lady doth protest too much.”

.

What is a ropen?

Those cryptozoologists who have explored tropical islands in Papua New Guinea, in search of living pterosaurs, believe the ropen is a large long-tailed flying creature having no feathers. It’s not yet officially classified in Western science.

.

Living Pterosaurs in Newspapers

young woman reads newspaper, from the Youtube video "Living Pterosaurs - in newspapers"

By the cryptozoologist Jonathan Whitcomb

On occasion over the past 16 years, a critic might say something like, “If pterosaur are still living, why do we not see newspaper articles on them?” Such a skeptic may assume that he or she would have heard or read about such a newspaper article if it existed. In reality, no critic of living-pterosaur investigations reads every headline of every newspaper, not even just the ones printed in the United States.

Last night, I uploaded a new video to Youtube, “Living Pterosaurs – in newspapers” and present it as an introduction to such newspaper articles. I believe it makes a good start in answering questions about such news publications, yet I hope to produce one or more additional videos about apparent extant “pterodactyls” in newspapers.

.

Jonathan Whitcomb at the end of a Youtube video

Jonathan Whitcomb in “Living Pterosaurs – in newspapers”

In contrast to most of the early videos on my new Youtube channel (Protect Animal Life), on this mini-documentary I speak on camera most of the time. It’s the second in a series of videos that introduce various topics related to the investigations of eyewitness reports of living pterosaurs.

.

Watch this video ↑

###

.

Video “Living Pterosaurs” on Youtube

It begins with a brief overview of what was accomplished in the late-20th-century expeditions on Umboi Island. It then covers a bit of what we did in the two expeditions of 2004, including my interviews of Gideon, Wesley, Mesa, and Michael: Three clear daylight sightings and one ropen-light sighting at night.

.

How Many Americans Have Seen a Modern Pterosaur?

The number of persons who have actually seen such a flying creature in the USA, at some time in their human life spans, after combining type-1 and type-2, is in the general neighborhood of 150,000. Please understand me here: This does NOT include misidentifications; it is the number of actual encounters between humans and extant pterosaurs in recent decades in the USA in terms of the combination of the first two types explained above.

.

Book reviews – living pterosaurs

What do these two living-pterosaur books have in common? Both of them give the reader details about two important sightings at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba: by little Patty Carson in 1965 and by the U.S. Marine Eskin C. Kuhn in 1971. (Both of these nonfictions, however, also cover many others sightings.)

  • Live Pterosaurs in America
  • The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur

.

New Video: Living Pterosaurs in England

I just uploaded a video to Youtube, from two detailed eyewitness accounts I received from Shropshire, England, with both of those sightings being in 2017.

.

Living pterosaurs in a podcast interview with Jonathan Whitcomb

On Beastly Theories

.

Living pterosaurs in newspaper articles

The Houston Chronicle, by circulation the ninth largest newspaper in the United States, pulled away the welcome mat to “flying dinosaurs” that might want to fly over southwest Texas . . .

.

Glen Kuban and Living Pterosaurs

"The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur" - a paperback nonfiction book

By non-fiction cryptozoology author Jonathan Whitcomb

Please consider the following, before I respond to a small portion of the negative comments that Glen Kuban has made about my writings. Not all of his writings are about me or my publications, but many of them are.

Introduction

From the middle of 2003 until early in 2019, I have spent well over 10,000 hours in my investigation of eyewitness sightings of possible living pterosaurs. Only a small portion of that time has been on expeditions and directly looking for the flying creatures that are described by eyewitnesses. Many of those hours have been in writing books and blog posts.

Yet those 10,000+ hours were spent entirely in this narrow, obscure branch of cryptozoology: related to sighting reports of flying creatures that appeared to be extant pterosaurs, a.k.a. “pterodactyls.” In other words, none of those hours involved Bigfoot or Loch Ness or any non-flying cryptid. I really have entirely specialized in this narrow branch of cryptozoology, possibly writing more about it than all other cryptozoologists combined, at least in the most obvious books and online publications.

I do not declare that all the hundreds of eyewitnesses saw exactly what they reported to me that they had seen, as if all the details must have been 100% correct. Yet the great majority of those who have been brave enough to contact me—those persons really did see a living pterosaur, in my opinion.

Glen J. Kuban seems to me to have dedicated much of his life, in the past seven years or so, to try to convince people that no modern pterosaur exists, anywhere on the planet, and that is where we completely disagree.

stack of 14 books: "The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur"

The most recent book written by Jonathan Whitcomb

.

Criticisms from Glen Kuban

Before dealing with Kuban’s criticisms of my book The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur, I need to put things in perspective. For many years, Kuban has criticized my work and writings. Many of these have been on his web page “Living Pterosaurs (‘pterodactyls’)?”

The August 15, 2018, version of his page is enormous. Consider the calculations done by the online counter at Word-counter (dot-net):

  • Number of words: 37,452
  • Number of characters: 238,194
  • Sentences: 1548
  • Paragraphs: 527
  • Time it may take you to read it: 2 hours and 16 minutes
  • Most common word: Whitcomb: 407

Yes, you read that last line correctly: The most common word in Glen Kuban’s web page about “living pterosaurs” is my surname, Whitcomb. (not counting words like “the,” and,” etc.) He actually mentions me much more often than 407 times, with pronouns, but you get the point. I don’t recommend taking the 136 minutes needed to read his web page.  If you do read it, I doubt you’ll see much about me that is positive; about 1% may be neutral about me.

I will not take the time to counter everything negative that Kuban says about me and my writings. I do not have a thousand hours or so that would be necessary to spend on it. I’ll just say that much of it is mostly false, some of it is almost entirely false, and a smaller portion of it is 100% false.

Please put yourself in my place. Should somebody publish hundreds of negative things about you, at least a very few might have some truth to them, would they not? Not one of us is perfect. At least a few of Kuban’s criticisms of my work and my writings have at least some merit, surely. But the point is this: The great majority of them have little, if any, merit or reasonable relevance.

A copy of "The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur" held by the hand of J. D. Whitcomb

The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur (by Jonathan Whitcomb)

.

Amazon Customer Review

Glen Kuban goes by the name of “Paleo View” on Amazon. I have nothing against people using a pen name when they write an Amazon customer review. In fact, a number of things might justify using a pseudonym online or in print publications. I do object, however, to the content of his comments about this book.

I now mention the original customer review Kuban wrote and put up on the Amazon page on January 29, 2019. Kuban sometimes makes changes in his online writings, after I make comments about them. He might make positive changes here, so please do not assume that he always holds onto his mistakes or fails to improve himself when his error is corrected and he learns about it. He does better at self-correction than a number of writers I have known of.

But a reader-book-review on Amazon is supposed to be about the book. In fact, their policy includes, “Customer Reviews and Questions and Answers should be about the product.” In other words, if the book is not about religion, then a person writing a review about that book should not write about the supposed religious beliefs of the author of the book.

The cryptozoology book The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur is not about religion. Mr. Kuban, however, included the following in his review of the book:

. . . many young-Earth creationists (YECs) such as Whitcomb often disregard this, however, Whitcomb’s claims are not even endorsed by any major creationist or cryptozoology groups . . .

Even if Kuban’s opinions about my religious beliefs are correct, the book should be the subject of the book review. Nothing in this book is about creationists or about the Bible or about religion. I expect, that by the time you read this, Amazon will have removed Kuban’s customer review of this book, and it may be because of his improper comments about religion.

The book review by Glen Kuban has other serious problems, but I’ll let this go for now. By the way, The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur is for young readers: older children and young teenagers.

###

.

Living pterosaur

Bioluminescence and the ropen of Papua New Guinea

.

Living pterosaurs and Glen Kuban

About the gigantic web page that is critical of living-pterosaur research and expeditions and publications

.

Nonfiction books on living pterosaurs

About two cryptozoology books by Jonathan Whitcomb:

  • Live Pterosaurs in America (third edition)
  • Searching for Ropens and Finding God (fourth edition)

.

Is the Ropen a “Stupid Fantasy?”

It began after the online publication of a photo of a biology professor from Oregon; he was standing by the Yakima River in Washington state. Professor Peter Beach (who has taught at a small college in the Portland area) was being interviewed by me, Jonathan D. Whitcomb (an American cryptozoology author), on August 6, 2014, with Milt Marcy (also from Portland), another cryptozoologist. . . .

.

New book about “flying dinosaurs”

Actually, I highly recommend my book that was just published: The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur. I just want to be sure that copies of it go to those young readers who want the adventure of approaching this subject with an open mind.

.

Another book on live pterosaurs

“At least hundreds of thousands of eyewitnesses worldwide have seen living pterosaurs, and real science must progress with human experience.”

.

*************************************************************************************

"The Girl who saw a Flying Dinosaur"

Short nonfiction cryptozoology book for kids and teens

From the title page of this book:

What the eyewitnesses have seen, in many areas of the world, are not literally flying dinosaurs. The correct name for this kind of flying creature is ‘pterosaur.’ How is that possible? All of them are said to have become extinct many millions of years ago. It takes a whole book to answer a question like, “Why do some people believe that some of them are still alive?” This is one of those books.

.