image_pdfimage_print

Cognitive Biases and Modern Pterosaurs

people who promote healing from addiction

By Jonathan Whitcomb

With all the potential of the human mind, we’re still hampered by many cognitive biases. Hardly any adult is free from this kind of weakness in thinking. In fact, the more fervently we would insist we’re immune the more likely we are to fall into at least one of them.

Let’s begin with two reevaluations I’ve recently made regarding my research on eyewitness reports of modern pterosaurs.

.

I reevaluated how many people have seen a “pterodactyl”

In 2019, I wrote the blog post “How many people see living pterodactyls?” Here is a key point, my opinion at that time:

[About] 37,500 Americans have told somebody something to the effect that they saw a flying creature that appeared more like a pterosaur than a bird or a bat . . .

But looking back on the 19 years of my investigation in this branch of cryptozoology, I should have received more emails from eyewitnesses, if more than 20,000 Americans fit the above. I now believe it’s more like this: 15,000 living Americans have reported such an encounter to another person.

Important to note is this: The vast majority of persons who received these shocking reports were not cryptozoologists or paranormal investigators but friends and family members of the eyewitnesses.

.

I reevaluated the general number of modern living pterosaurs

I don’t have a number or a range for how many “pterodactyls” live on this planet or even just in the United States. But I now believe that these flying creatures are rare, not just uncommon. The scarcity of convincing photos and video clips helps make this point.

.

Cognitive biases and living pterosaurs

people who promote healing from addiction
People can choose how to think and act

For some time, I thought that confirmation bias may have been the most significant of the cognitive biases regarding living-pterosaur investigations during the past two or three decades. I was aware of some of the factors of another bias but did not know it had a name: “availability cascade”.

It refers to “a self-reinforcing cycle that explains the development of certain kinds of collective beliefs” (Wikipedia). This explains why so many Westerners react the way they do when they first encounter a report of a person seeing a living “pterodactyl”.

.

Availability cascade

This is  a self-reinforcing activity whereby a belief, in people of a culture or community, gains more and more popularity through repetition. How does this relate to sightings of apparent living pterosaurs in the United States? It’s in extinction indoctrination.

Of all the various types of cognitive biases, availability cascade now seems to have had the greatest negative influence on American thinking, regarding modern pterosaurs, from around the late 19th century to the present.

Critics of these investigations in cryptozoology seem to constantly fall into the availability cascade bias constantly without knowing it. Even before the beginning of the 19th century, when Benjamin Franklin was still living, the idea of pterosaur extinction was hatched. The problem grew throughout that century and was amplified during the 20th century.

Fortunately, the news about pterosaur sightings has been presented to the public since the beginning of the 21st century, because of the internet. On the downside, attacks against the investigations have also increased.

The truth, however, will prevail in the end.

.

###

.

Confirmation bias and living pterosaurs

As an adult, you have preexisting assumptions on various matters. We all do. When we encounter a new idea seemingly related to something we already have an opinion on, we might fall into a confirmation bias.

.

How many persons have seen a living pterosaur?

Some years ago, I estimated the total number of persons living worldwide who had some kind of encounter with a living pterosaur, yet we need to keep in mind that most of those persons had just vague encounters at night, with no clear view of any form or features of the animals: between 7 million and 128 million humans who had mostly brief shadowy encounters.

.

Living pterosaurs

How did scientists miss living pterosaurs? Get the answers here, hidden secrets about how these amazing flying creatures of the night have gone mostly unreported . . . [book about modern pterodactyls]

.

Common Cognitive Biases

Why do these biases happen? Attention is a limited resource. This means we can’t possibly evaluate every possible detail and event ​when forming thoughts and opinions.

.

Press release on living pterosaurs

“Two eyewitnesses of strange flying creatures in North America were college professors: One had taught biology; the other, aeronautics. I concluded that each of those two men had, more likely than not, witnessed a flying creature unlike any known bird or bat.

.

Civil War pterodactyl photo

For almost any person who reads the CWP online page, it would seem obvious: Ptp came from that episode of Feakylinks in the year 2000. . . . Yet here is the real point: NOBODY can get the entire image of Ptp from the episode Coelacanth This!, yet on the internet you can find complete images of Ptp . . .

.

More on living pterosaurs

Late in 2006, Garth Guessman, a living-pterosaur investigator, interviewed three Americans who had worked in or visited a medical mission in Central New Britain Island, Papua New Guinea. The three had separate sightings of what may be Pterodactyloids (short-tailed pterosaurs).

.

Bias about living pterosaurs

[Are Biblical creationists biased regarding these apparent living pterosaurs?] Some . . . assume that universal pterosaur extinction cannot be successfully challenged and that those who mention eyewitness sightings are misguided in a severe bias. The problem with that position becomes obvious when we examine the eyewitnesses: Few of them are creationists.

.

Bias and pterodactyl sightings

Jonathan Whitcomb confesses that in about 1969 he disbelieved an eyewitness of an apparent “pterodactyl” that a high school student reported had flown up into the mountains north of Altadena and Pasadena, California.

.

Report a pterosaur sighting

Communicate with Jonathan Whitcomb by email.

.

The Discovery of Modern Pterosaurs

By Jonathan Whitcomb

Why it’s important to report a pterodactyl sighting

I just read a comment under my recently-produced Youtube video “Three Pterodactyls and the Oregon Surfer” on my channel Protect Animal Life. I now refer to the writer of that comment as BW.

He said, at first, “Large flying animals CANNOT go unfound in the modern world”. What a strong declaration! Yet he immediately modifies it: “its [sic] exceedingly difficult if not impossible for large flying animals to avoid detection.” Even the second statement, however, has a serious flaw.

Look at the context: The short video he comments on reveals how one person, while surfing off the coast of Oregon, “found” that not all pterosaurs are extinct. The surfer saw three “large flying animals”. In other words, this was a case of the “detection” of an animal that BW assumes cannot exist. BW seems intent on convincing people that such flying creatures do not exist.

Title of a Youtube video, with surfer in background

One of many videos on the Youtube channel Protect Animal Life

We could stop there, stating that BW was guilty of circular reasoning. It’s something like this: “The animals cannot exist because they have not been detected, so the surfer could not have seen them because they do not exist.” The point is that some persons DO SEE what other persons have not yet seen. And yet there is much more.

The case for the discovery of modern pterosaurs does not rest only on the word of one surfer in Oregon. For countless centuries, countless eyewitnesses of large flying creatures have proclaimed what they have seen. In other words, long before BW was born, people have seen things that BW has not yet seen with his own eyes.

Modern pterosaurs were known as dragons long ago. Perhaps none of the drawings and paintings of them were done by eyewitnesses. Artists surely relied on earlier artists, and even the oldest depictions may have been drawn or painted from secondhand reports at the very best. The old dragon images we now see may contain many errors yet may provide glimpses into some truth about those flying creatures. Many serious researchers might even come to discover for themselves that the general case is this: Those large flying creatures from earlier human history were real animals.

old drawing of a dragon with wings and two feet

###

.

Ropen Videos on Youtube

On the Youtube channel Protect Animal Life, you can find well over 200 videos on modern pterosaurs . . .

.

Youtube Again: “Were Dragons Real?”

. . . other countries where the flying creatures have been reported: Australia, the Philippines, Sudan, Namibia, etc.

.

The discovery of modern pterosaurs

“. . . the expedition led by Peter Beach and Milt Marcy in 2015 resulted in what may have been the first video footage of a living pterosaur being recorded in a remote jungle and carried back to the United States for distribution on Youtube and elsewhere.” [other than just flying lights]

.

An Individual Ropen is Identified

How do I know that a ropen with a thirty-foot wingspan, now hunting house cats and killing chickens in Nevada, is the same animal seen in Draper, Utah, a few years ago? . . .

.

Modern pterodactyls

I am a scientist, and I have discovered that the great majority of eyewitness sighting reports of extant pterosaurs are neither misidentifications nor hoaxes; part of my conclusion is based upon the data from eyewitness estimates of wingspan.

.

Dragon Almost Everywhere – Bat-Like Bird or a Ropen

Pterodactyl sightings in various parts of the world—this includes video footage of a ropen flying over Raleigh, North Carolina, in recent years.

.

Discovery of living pterodactyls

“For decades, reports of “pterodactyls” in New Guinea (the country later renamed Papua New Guinea) were dismissed with the explanation that people were just observing flying foxes.” We now know that idea is false, for that kind of bat is not nearly large enough and it does not have a long tail.

.

An American Soldier saw a Living Pterosaur in World War II

PART ONE

By the living-pterosaurs expert Jonathan Whitcomb

This is a reply to a portion of a huge web page that was written by the living-pterosaur critic Glen Kuban: “Living Pterosaurs (‘Pterodactyls’)”. I recommend avoiding that page, for it is very misleading and biased against the possibility that at least one species of pterosaur may have survived into modern times.

Introduction to the ropen sighting by Duane Hodgkinson

Around mid-1944, on the eastern edge of the island of New Guinea, after the Japanese military had left that area of the southwest Pacific, two American soldiers obtained permission to hike into the jungle interior west of Finschhafen. While in a jungle clearing that was about a hundred feet across, they witnessed a huge flying creature take off into the air. That sighting in clear daylight, with no obstruction to the view of those two men, has in recent years become known, among at least some cryptozoologists, as an important report among many accounts of encounters with living pterosaurs in the 20th century. To the best of what my associates and I can determine, this was an encounter with a gigantic extant Rhamphorhynchoid (long-tailed) pterosaur.

photo of Finschhafen Harbor, Papua New Guinea - photo by Jonathan Whitcomb

Finschhafen Harbor in Papua New Guinea (recorded by Whitcomb)

In the 21st century, the cryptozoologists Garth Guessman and I (Jonathan Whitcomb) interviewed Duane Hodgkinson, one of the two eyewitnesses of that “pterodactyl.” The other soldier, George, we have not been able to interview. Here is part of what was reported by the World War II veteran Duane Hodgkinson:

  • The wingspan of the flying creature was similar to that of a Piper Tri-Pacer airplane (about 29 feet)
  • The long tail was definitely not a misidentification of the feet of the animal
  • The estimated length of the tail was “at least” ten or fifteen feet
  • The “pterodactyl” had a long horn-like appendage coming out the back of its head (This especially caught Hodgkinson’s attention)

Introduction to Guessman and Whitcomb

I communicated with Hodgkinson by telephone and by letters, and he was very open to answering all of my questions. In addition, my associate and friend Garth Guessman visited the World War II veteran in Livingston, Montana, in 2005. Their interview was videotaped and I later edited it and published it online: “Ropen-Pterodactyl American Eyewitness.” Many of the keys points of the interview, but not all of them, can be seen in that Youtube video.

This was not the first eyewitness that Guessman and I had interviewed, during our investigations of sightings of apparent pterosaurs. Both of us explored Umboi Island in 2004, in separate expeditions, and we interviewed a number of native eyewitnesses on that remote tropical island in Papua New Guinea. In addition, Guessman and I have interviewed eyewitnesses in North America and have searched for those flying creatures in the western United States.

To learn more about us and those we have worked with, or in harmony with, see the following page about some of those who have searched for modern living pterosaurs like the ropen:

About us — living-pterosaur investigators

Jonathan Whitcomb, Garth Guessman, David Woetzel, and Paul Nation

Guessman and I are true cryptozoologists, questioning eyewitnesses and searching for the cryptids that we specialize in: apparent extant pterosaurs.

Introduction to Glen Kuban

From his page on Wikipedia, this computer programmer does not appear to have any connection with living-pterosaur investigations, although he is connected with apparent dinosaur footprints. From my experiences in communicating with him, on occasions over a period of many years, I’ve come to see Glen Kuban as an amateur paleontologist. He is certainly not a cryptozoologist, at least not in the usual sense. And in spite of the lack of any indication on Wikipedia, he has been very much involved in reports of apparent living pterosaurs, albeit he was devoted a portion of his life to trying to disprove them.

During the eleven years or so that I have read of his criticisms of living-pterosaur investigations, and from our communications by emails, I have seen no evidence that Glen Kuban has ever interviewed even one eyewitness. He has written an exhaustive web page that appears to be aimed at convincing people that all species of pterosaurs became extinct long ago. His “Living Pterosaurs (Pterodactyls)?” appears to have been written to protect standard models of geology and popular assumptions about Darwinian evolution.

How large is Kuban’s “Living Pterosaurs” online page? It mentions me by name (“Whitcomb”) 493 times, yes four hundred ninety three times in the”5 Dec 2020″ version of “Living Pterosaurs – Pterodactyls”. Many web pages, on whatever subject, do not even have a total word count of over 400. His web page, which tries to discredit the possibility that not all species of pterosaurs are extinct, has 40,676 words. Keep in mind that the whole point of that enormous web page is to support a Western assumption that began to be formulated when Benjamin Franklin was still living, two centuries ago: that every species of pterosaur is extinct. It brings to my mind a phrase in Hamlet: “The lady doth protest too much.”

How ironic that Kuban says, “whenever ‘living fossils’ have been found before, scientists have gladly reported and widely celebrated them” but he maintains a web page of 40,676 words that is entirely dedicated to trying to convince people that any report that might seem to support a featherless flying “living fossil” is to be disbelieved. And with all his tens of thousands of words, he actually mentions less than 1% of all the sightings that people around the world have had of these flying creatures. And he still, as of the end of 2020, seems to have interviewed NOT EVEN ONE EYEWITNESS of an apparent modern living pterosaur.

{This  Part One of a post that was originally on the blog Pterosaur Fossils but has been transferred to Live Pterosaur. The original post was deleted on PF because that blog will be discontinued}

Part Two: An American Soldier Sees a Pterodactyl

Part Three: American Soldier Encounters a Gigantic Pterodactyl

###

.

Youtube video “Pterodactyl Sightings . . .”

Two video trailers feature overviews of “Pterodactyl Caught on Camera – Part 2” and “Giant Pterodactyl in California” two out of over 100 videos on modern pterosaurs on this Youtube channel “Protect Animal Life”.

.

Pterosaur sighting in World War II

A modern pterosaur!? How could it be? Extraordinary but true, huge flying creatures, with no feathers yet unlike any bat, live among us, although they mostly fly at night.

.

Pterodactyl seen by Duane Hodgkinson

The kongamato and sightings of modern pterosaurs

.

An American Soldier Sees a Pterodactyl

PART TWO

By the living-pterosaurs expert Jonathan Whitcomb

Living-pterosaur sighting by Hodgkinson — answering criticisms

I think Kuban would have done much better in writing about this sighting if he had communicated with me before publishing his criticisms. As they stand, as of December 5, 2020, his many paragraphs about Hodgkinson’s encounter with an apparent “pterodactyl” have many grave weaknesses and clear indications of severe misunderstandings on Kuban’s part.

Is it important for a researcher to interview eyewitnesses? Consider what Kuban himself has said: “Whitcomb admits that he never interviewed George. So, if anyone was over-speculating, it was not me.” (I have never, as of April 23, 2021, interviewed George, the army buddy of Duane Hodgkinson.) I admit that I may speculate, to some degree and at some times, but let’s examine the context here.

Kuban, during the years that he has published online criticisms of eyewitness accounts of living pterosaurs, has never interviewed even one eyewitness. His general practice is to take what he finds online or in books and, without asking me for clarifications on what I have written, finds anything and everything that he thinks might discredit the sighting; then he publishes it. That is what his tens of thousands of words have shown to me.

I admit that I sometimes make mistakes. In one of my earlier editions of Searching for Ropens, I may have said that Hodgkinson’s army buddy was a biologist. If I did, however, I was speculating. In the fourth edition of Searching for Ropens and Finding God, I put it thus: “Hodgkinson was not a biologist but his army buddy was, or at least had some education in biology.” Even there, I may have been speculating. I wrote that, because Hodgkinson gave us some indication that his buddy considered himself to have some knowledge of science in general or possibly of biology in particular. In reality, that is far short of evidence that he actually was a real, dependable expert in biology.

Glen Kuban, however, seems to have taken that mistake that I made and tried to turn it into some significant fact, a practically-given proof, perhaps, that George was either a biology professor or a qualified expert in biology who could be relied on. That is what I consider “over-speculating.” From what Hodgkinson told me and Guessman, it is possible that George had taken one or more classes in biology, if he had taken even one college course in biology.

The point is this: George made it clear, within seconds of the end of that sighting in that jungle clearing in 1944, that he would not tell anybody what he and Hodgkinson had seen. Nothing in Hodgkinson’s testimony gave even a hint that George said anything about the possibility that they had seen a bird or bat. To the best that we can now determine from Hodgkinson’s testimony, George just wanted to keep quiet about the encounter, apparently even if that meant denying that they had seen anything.

That kind of denial does not come from a biologist observing an unusual bird or a huge bat. It certainly can come from a man who would like to be respected as knowledgeable and who has just witnessed a gigantic living pterosaur fly up out of the middle of a jungle clearing in the middle of the day. That kind of man would not want to be laughed at. He would not want to appear to be the biggest fool in history.

Part Three: American Soldier Encounters a Gigantic Pterodactyl

Part One: American Soldier saw a Living Pterosaur in World War II

###

.

man is interviewed because of a pterosaur sighting

Two long-tailed pterodactyls (pterosaurs) seen in western Minnesota (video)

.